PMC Weekly Review - March 02, 2018

A Macro View: “February Monthly Recap"

The domestic equity market reminded investors in February that volatility does still exist. The modest weakness in the final week of January turned into a rout over the first few trading days of February, as investors were spooked by data showing the first signs of inflation, including continuing upward wage pressure. This data sent all of the major indices down 7.5%-9.0% by February 8. However, ongoing positive earnings reports, including the significant projected impact of the tax reform bill passed in December, allowed the market to recover a little more than half of those losses over the remainder of the month. Energy was one of the worst performing sectors, as rising US inventories caused oil prices to fall nearly 8.0%. The more defensive segments of the market were also hit hard, particularly the dividend payers and other bond proxies, as interest rates rose sharply during the first three weeks of February. The Information Technology sector had the only positive return for the month, very modest in the large cap space and essentially flat in small caps.

February was the first month since last March that posted a negative return in all three of the major US Indices: the Dow fell 4.0%; the S&P 500 was down 3.7%; and the NASDAQ dropped by 3.7%. Large caps, as represented by the Russell Top 200 Index, were down 3.5% for the month, marginally outperforming small caps (Russell 2000 Index declined 3.9%) and mid caps (Russell Midcap Index fell 4.1%). The growth indices, led by their technology weights, outperformed their value counterparts by 1.8%-2.2%, across the market spectrum. The Bloomberg Commodity Index as a whole was down 1.7% but up 0.7% when the energy component is removed. The Dow Jones Wilshire U.S. REIT Index was down 7.6% for the month.

The international equity markets modestly underperformed the domestic markets in February, falling in sync during the first two weeks, but failing to rally nearly as far as the US indices during the latter half. Eurozone GDP growth remains strong, relative to recent history, and has shown signs of expanding beyond the core countries, as recent data from Spain and Portugal were particularly strong. Unemployment continues to fall across the common market as well. Yet the most recent CPI data shows inflation still well below the European Central Bank’s (ECB) target of 2%. Japan also reported the eighth consecutive quarter of positive GDP growth; however, the 0.5% annualized reading was well below the market’s expectation of 0.9%. The EAFE Index declined 3.7%, dragged lower by Greece, Spain, and Germany, all of which fell more than 6.8%. The emerging markets outperformed their developed counterparts, as the Emerging Market (EM) Index was down just 3.3%. Russia led the way, up more than 3.0% for the month.

Domestic fixed income markets largely posted negative returns in February, as interest rates rose sharply. Economic data continued to show modest but consistent wage growth, and January’s CPI numbers surprised to the upside. The US Treasury curve steepened slightly during the month, as the yield on the 2-year Treasury note rose 12 basis points, while yields on both the 10-year note and 30-year bond were up 15 basis points. Short-term indices hovered around the breakeven point, but losses increased the further investors moved out the yield curve.

The Aggregate Index (down 95 basis points) was dragged lower by a 1.5% decline in corporate credit, its main driver over the last several years, and both the mortgage-backed security (MBS) sector (down 66 basis points) and Treasurys (down 75 basis points) also struggled. The noninvestment grade indices fared slightly better, as the higher coupons of the High Yield Index (down 85 basis points) partially shielded investors from the rise in rates, and the floating rate nature of the S&P LSTA Leveraged Loan Index created a gain of 20 basis points for the month.

The municipal market continued to outperform the taxable market in February. New supply remains scarce, while municipal mutual funds received substantial inflows in two of the first three weeks. The 1-3 Year Index was up 14 basis points, while the 22+ Year Index was down just 42 basis points. Negative monthly returns, even those as modest as February’s, have traditionally led to substantial outflows from municipal funds. When combined with the presumed seasonal outflows in late March and early April, as individual investors pay their taxes, it would be easy to predict a difficult few months for the muni market. But new issuance averaged less than $5 billion a week in February, and the 30-day forward calendar has remained stable at $9.5 billion, meaning it may take a very significant drop in demand before munis begin to underperform the taxable market.

The international fixed income markets also fell during February, at least in dollar terms. Yields on German Bunds, UK Gilts, and Japanese Government Bonds all ended the month lower, creating a modestly positive return for the currency hedged version of the Global Aggregate ex-US Index. However, the dollar ended higher against most currencies in February, the first month of appreciation since last October, both wiping out the gain and leaving the unhedged version of the Index down 85 basis points. The dollar also rallied against a broad swath of emerging markets currencies, which weighed on the local currency JPMorgan Government Bond Index (JPM GBI) performance (down1.0%). Negative performance was even more pronounced for the hard currency JPMorgan Emerging Market Bond Index (JPM EMBI) (down 2.0%), as rising Treasury yields put upward rate pressure on dollar-denominated emerging markets government bonds, which trade at a spread over Treasurys.

Nathan Behan, CFA, CAIA
SVP, Investment Research

Download the full PDF

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2018 Envestnet. All rights reserved.