PMC Weekly Review - May 13, 2016
The dollar has struggled thus far in 2016, bucking the last two years’ strong upward trend when it gained 13% and 9% in 2014 and 2015, respectively, versus other major world currencies as measured by the U.S. Dollar Index (DXY). During the first four months of the year, DXY declined nearly 6%. A weak dollar helps companies that have significant international businesses, as their sales outside the US are worth more in dollar terms, even though they are doing the same amount of business. Currently, approximately one-third of aggregate sales of S&P 500 companies are generated outside the US.
Two major currency impacts on company businesses are the effects of translation and transaction. Translation effect involves the beginning and end values of the currency, regardless of the path in between. For example, if a US company has a subsidiary doing pure domestic business (such as utilities) in Japan, its sales will appear to be stronger by 13% in dollars this year, even though there is no actual business growth, as the Japanese yen rose 13% against the dollar during the first four months of the year.
But the other effect, transaction, does matter for most multinational companies. Transaction effect is not just about the beginning and end values of the currency, but more about the path, or the average value for the period, as businesses conduct currency transactions on an ongoing basis. The daily average currency value for the period is far more important to them. On that measure, the dollar decline has been quite modest so far this year. The daily average of DXY during the first four months of 2016 was only 3% lower than it was at the beginning of the year, and is still nearly 3% higher than the daily average of the first four months of 2015.
Envestnet | PMC believes the current dollar weakness is likely to be temporary. After surging over 20% in just two years (an unusually large movement for a diversified currency index), a counter-trend retreat is not unusual. The fundamentals supporting a strong dollar are still intact. There is little argument that the US has the strongest economic fundamentals among major world economies—solid economic growth, a strong labor market, and tepid inflation. For most other countries stuck either with anemic economic growth, deflation spiral, or both, there appears to be no end in sight. In terms of monetary policy, the divergence between the US and others can’t be clearer. Here in the US, the talk is focused on how many more rate hikes we will have for the rest of the year, or the additional excuses the Federal Reserve (Fed) can find to delay raising them. In most of the Eurozone and Japan, where negative interest rates are already in force, the talk is centered on how to get both rates and currencies to fall, and by how much. The inability and incompetence of central banks in both the Eurozone and Japan to drive their currencies lower were partly to blame for the weak dollar so far this year. They were explicit in their drive to push their currencies lower, but the execution (and the communication) was lousy. They will keep trying.
A strong dollar is not that dreadful, nor should we fear it. The 1990s was a decade in which the dollar was strong, but both the US economy and stock market prospered. Mercantilism, which is the notion that accumulating trade balances through protectionism generates wealth, is such a backward and petty economic theory that the US has long rejected it. Countries and economies obsessed with mercantilism are doomed to fail, while countries and economies that take a high road are destined to succeed.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2016 Envestnet. All rights reserved.