PMC Weekly Review - April 28, 2017
Global markets are at a euphoric high, reflecting optimism around President Trump’s pro-growth policies and the prospect of economic expansion. On Wednesday, the White House put the wheels in motion, declaring that President Trump would press for the largest tax cut in history—its centerpiece being a reduction of the business tax rate to 15%. In order to abstain from a political debate, let’s put aside the questions of how this plan will be funded and whether it will pass Congress and, instead, examine the economic viability of this move.
Last week, on April 19, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released its April 2017 Global Financial Stability Report, acknowledging the gain in economic momentum since President Trump came into office. However, a key policy question raised was: Can the United States corporate sector support a safe economic expansion? According to the IMF, many firms have the capacity to increase capital expenditures, and their ability to do so will be magnified by the potential tax reforms. However, the bad news is that corporate leverage is close to an all-time high. Rising corporate leverage and increasing signs of stretched valuations pose some serious challenges to the economy and can limit the capacity of firms to expand without increasing stability risks.
According to the IMF report, the median net debt across firms in the S&P 500 is close to its historic peak of 1.5 times earnings—these firms collectively account for approximately one-third of the $36 trillion economy-wide sector balance sheet. This trend is not unique to the S&P 500: examining a broader set of approximately 4,000 firms confirms that leverage has risen to levels exceeding those just prior to the global financial crisis. To make things worse, the average interest coverage ratio—a measure of the ability of current earnings to cover interest expenses—has fallen sharply over the past two years, and earnings have dropped to less than six times interest expense. This is close to the weakest multiple since the onset of the global financial crisis.
All this comes at a time when the Federal Reserve (Fed) continues to follow through with a series of prudent rate hikes to bring interest rates back to normalization. The IMF report predicts that, under the Fed’s assumed interest rate increases, firms that account for 22% of corporate assets appear to be unable to meet their interest expenses out of current earnings. Although these firms are concentrated in the energy sector as a result of oil price volatility, the proportion of challenged firms has broadened to encompass several other sectors of the economy, such as real estate and utilities. Together, these distressed sectors account for almost half of the US investment landscape.
The US corporate sector is not doomed, but it is walking on eggshells. Looking ahead, the concerns around financial stability are twofold: the heavily indebted state of the corporate sector makes it more vulnerable to a rise in interest rates, and a reduction in tax rates is likely to exacerbate this situation by encouraging firms to engage in more risk-taking behavior. The IMF’s recommendation is to get the policy mix right, which may mean balancing stimulus and tax reform against broader policy considerations that safeguard financial stability. Reducing corporate tax rates may be a step in the right direction, but with the deregulation of the financial industry already taking place, it may be just a matter of time until the economy self corrects and finds its way to equilibrium again.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2017 Envestnet. All rights reserved.