Commentaries

PMC Weekly Review - July 13, 2018

A Macro View: Brexit – Nothing’s Ever Easy

British Prime Minister Theresa May’s unenviable task of negotiating the British exit (Brexit) from the European Union (EU) has been dogged by challenges at every turn. However, the events of the past week may prove to be insurmountable for the beleaguered Prime Minister and ultimately lead to her downfall. In spite of the turbulence confronting her government, markets appear to be slightly optimistic about how the Brexit talks are developing.

The historic referendum of June 23, 2016 (wherein the peoples of the United Kingdom voted to withdraw from the EU) resulted in panic selling, as the FTSE 100 dropped approximately 3.15% and 2.55% on the two subsequent trading days, respectively. Nevertheless, whether because of a growing local economy, a recovering global economy, or belief that the British politicians could negotiate an advantageous withdrawal from the EU, the FTSE 100 rallied from a low of 5,982.20 after the vote to 7,692 as of July 10, 2018. The British pound depreciated in value over this time, falling from 1.4883 GBP/USD on June 23 to nearly 1.2 GBP/USD before finding support above 1.30 GBP/USD.

On March 29, 2017, the United Kingdom became the first member of the EU to trigger Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty, a relatively new amendment to the original agreements signed by the EU member states that permitted and outlined, albeit vaguely, the process by which a state could withdraw from the EU. In order to navigate these unknown waters, Prime Minister Theresa May formed a government that included, amongst others, a number of pro-Brexit politicians.

One of the biggest uncertainties surrounding Brexit was the type of agreement that would be reached between the negotiating bodies. The following provides a simplified explanation of the major differences between the two approaches. A “soft Brexit,” also known as the “Norway Model,” would theoretically be the least disruptive on an economic level. In this scenario, the United Kingdom would participate in the single market created by the EU, but still be required to recognize the free movement of people from other member states of the EU within its borders. The alternative is the free trade model of the “hard Brexit,” referred to as the “Canada Model.” In this case, the United Kingdom would not be granted the free trade benefits of the single market, but would have greater control over immigration matters.

That brings us to the present. Operating under the belief that the Prime Minister was favoring a “soft Brexit,” three prominent members of Prime Minister May’s cabinet and two Tory party vice-chairs resigned in protest over the course of the week. Further threatening her standing was the specter of a “no confidence” vote being raised, although this threat appears to have subsided as the week progressed.

The fears of the Brexit hardliners were confirmed on July 12, when the Prime Minister released a “soft Brexit” proposal that she claimed had already been “cleared” by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, although there are doubts on both sides as to whether this is the case.Nevertheless, this development has opened the floor to a fresh wave of concern from both the opposition and members of the Prime Minister’s own party.

Further complicating the situation is President Trump’s visit to the UK at the end of the week. Although he had been a vocal proponent of Brexit, his critics fear that his administration may be seeking to take advantage of Britain’s increasingly isolated position to negotiate trade agreements that are heavily weighted in favor of the United States.

So how are markets reacting to these developments? As previously noted, investors have pushed British equities higher over the past two years, going so far as to set record highs. Although we can only speculate as to how much farther the UK’s bull market will run, some short-term volatility has driven the FTSE 100 down about 3% from its record high. Bullish investors might view this small margin as an opportunity to buy before the market continues its rally. Even last week’s short-term noise appears to have been more or less shrugged off, as the FTSE 100 turned positive going into the end of the week. On the other hand, bearish investors could point to the delicacy of the Brexit negotiations and the potential for an agreement that handicaps the British economy, Theresa May’s increasingly fragile position, or simply the rally exhausting itself and breaking below its support at roughly 7,500.

Given the delicate balancing act Britain faces, this will be a situation to monitor in the coming weeks, as new developments could have a significant impact on the valuation of British equities and the global capital markets as a whole.

Jeremy Soister
Associate Institutional Consultant

Source: Bloomberg

Download the full PDF

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2018 Envestnet. All rights reserved.

Featuring

Jeremy Soister
Associate Institutional Consultant

Articles By This Author

PMC Weekly Review - July 13, 2018