Commentaries

The Envestnet Edge, March 2015

Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisors Closer

Download the full PDF

It may have taken years for automation to disrupt the financial services industry, but a recent rapid growth in robo-advisors likely means that significant changes lie ahead in the asset and wealth management landscape. Are human advisors facing a threat, or is it an opportunity?

On July 1, the film Terminator: Genysis will debut in theaters across the United States and throughout the world. It will be the fourth installment of a series that began more than 30 years ago, which in many ways defined contemporary fears of the rise of the machines: a world where the brilliant programs designed by humans themselves become the masters and turn against their human creators.

This cultural meme permeates modern life. Think of The Matrix movies and their dystopian vision of a world in which machines enslave humans; and before that, the widely popular Isaac Asimov stories that began with I, Robot. The innovations of technology that went into hyper-drive in the 1990s often have been seen as both empowering and liberating. They also are twined with what is a not-so-subtle anxiety that technology may cause more harm than good.

As many are aware, the financial services world now is experiencing its own form of this fear with the rise of “robo-advisors”: wealth management software that potentially can replace many of the traditional functions of an advisor. Most of the companies offering these services are tech start-ups that have attracted substantial venture capital funding – close to $500 million as of the end of 20141. In addition, established companies such as Schwab and Vanguard have unveiled their own software that can design an investment menu based on the answers to a set of questions that a human advisor would traditionally ask. Examples are: “How old are you?” “What is your income?” “When do you plan to retire?” Once the answers are obtained, the program can progress even deeper.

To date, the volume of assets in absolute terms that these new firms manage is small compared to the overall level of assets under management. It is at $19 billion, compared to the $33 trillion in potential investable assets. True, the growth curve has been steep and impressive for robo-advisors, having nearly doubled in 2014, but that is from a tiny base, and the absolute amount remains equally tiny.

Still, the financial services world legitimately is attuned to the changes afoot. It’s not a question merely of the degree of change now, but, rather, how much there potentially will be in the future. Here, too, there are ample precedents set by other industries. The financial services world in general and its asset management and wealth management subsets in particular have been laggards when it comes to the disruptive effects of technology. The only other industry that has been so slow to integrate the information technologies of the past two decades is health care, where only now, for instance, medical records are being digitized.

The rise of the machines

A look at what has happened over the past decades to other industries suggests that concerns about the potentially disruptive effects of robo-advisors may be justified. Traditional manufacturing has been more disrupted by automation and robotics than by free trade and outsourcing labor to China and elsewhere. Automated and flexible factories now can churn out more stuff with a smaller portion of the labor market than it once required. Manufacturing in the United States now employs a fraction of the workforce it did fifty years ago. For example, in 1970, nearly 25% of the American labor force was engaged in manufacturing; today, that figure is less than 9%2. Yet that 9% of workers (about 12 million today) produces much more than the 25% did in 1970.

That is the dual-edge of technology: it minimizes input by creating efficiencies and reducing the cost of doing whatever it is we do, and at the same time results in maximizing output by producing a greater number of goods and services. The problem for societies is that labor is not merely an input; it also is a vital aspect of a stable social order. So reducing the input cost of labor simultaneously allows us to do more with less and can reduce income, at least in the short-term. Long-term, our collective prosperity has been increasing, but not without massive disruptions along the way.

This is the context for today’s concern in the wealth management space about robo-advisors. The broader financial services industry already has had a taste of similar disruption: the upsurge of ATM machines at retail bank branches in the 1990s that largely decimated the bank branch labor force. For investors, the rise of quantitative investing enhanced by complicated software running on algorithms changed the nature of investing. It led directly to ETFs and a host of other passive investing strategies that offer investors much lower-cost exposure to stocks and bonds. Hence the concern about active-versus-passive investing. Although the level of overall assets in passive investments is still minimal compared to those under active management, the growth of passive strategies has been far more robust, as has been the increase in robo-assets.

Don’t fear the machines—embrace the change

The fear of the machines is both understandable and overstated. Tech apostles are prone to grandiose statements about the future effects of what they offer, but they can be tone deaf about the human element. Machines and software have been most effective at either replacing human beings or enhancing their ability to perform tasks that are simple and binary. Assembling a car or accepting deposits or investing in a basket of stocks – these are straightforward processes amenable to automation. But more sophisticated tasks also may be vulnerable, including those that require complex calculations such as the performance of a portfolio and identifying its risk characteristics.

What may be less susceptible to automation are activities that involve multiple variables that change constantly. Planning for a financial future fits into that category. A person can answer a suite of questions to establish an investment menu. Those answers can frame a portfolio and a plan, but will be valid only so long as the answers don’t change over time, and if the underlying investments perform as forecast. That is seldom the case. Hence the profound need for people who are constantly focused on these issues to respond to changing needs and shifting answers.

A perceived threat is really an enhancement

The concern that robo-advisors, or quantitative strategies, or passive investing eventually will obviate the need for human advisors and investors is overblown. We do not perceive a rise of the machines as a threat; rather, we see them as an enhancement. Yes, these new companies and programs may make it increasingly harder for professionals to offer cookie-cutter services. These companies and programs will challenge advisors and investors who adopt a paint-by-numbers approach, and that will be all for the best. Few aspects of our lives are paint-by-numbers, nor should be our plans for investing, for retiring, and for creating a stable financial future.

The likely result is a world in which both robo- and flesh-and-blood advisors thrive and build upon one another. Software programs are only as good as the people who program them, even if smart-machines that can learn and adapt lie in our future.

The wealth management and financial services world is facing technological disruption. That is a fact that needs to be accepted, not feared nor fought. It will change how money is managed and channeled. But it will not replace the need for skilled people, and may, instead, increase it. The threat is not that the tools of information technology will become ever more robust; rather, it is that the people who can best use them will resist doing so. The wealth management world has been sheltered from many of the sea changes caused by information technology. That is coming to an end, and at the same time, is opening up a world of possibilities.

Advisor Take-Away

Barring a quantum leap to sentient machines, robo-advisors will not replace their human counterparts – whether in the near or distant future. The ability to provide holistic solutions tailored to different clients can’t be achieved easily by automation. When taken together, financial planning, asset selection and allocation, portfolio construction and rebalancing, and tax management constitute a highly involved endeavor that only human advisors can address appropriately. Seldom will a “set it and forget it” strategy ever meet a client’s requirements throughout their investing lifetime. Rather than fear the robo-advisor, human advisors should welcome them with open arms and recognize the opportunity to enhance their own service model. Advisors might, as one example, cede certain basic allocations and investments to a robo-advisor or platform in order to shift their focus toward establishing more effective partnerships with their clients and developing more insightful solutions along several dimensions. The larger point is that wealth managers, like every segment of society, will be best served by embracing the rise of new technologies rather than fearing them.

1 Source: "Investors Snap Up Online Financial Advisers", Wall Street Journal, 12 February 2015.

2 Source: EPI Briefing Paper #388, Economic Policy Institute, January 2015

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this commentary is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and their returns assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet | PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet | PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2015 Envestnet, Inc. All rights reserved.

Featuring

Zachary Karabell
Head of Global Strategies, Envestnet, Inc., Consultant to Investment Committee*

Articles By This Author

The Envestnet Edge, September 2017 Video: Time To Take A (Measured) Risk? The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2017 Video: Bitcoin: Buy Or Buyer Beware? The Envestnet Edge, June 2017 Video: FANG, FAAMG: Too Big a Bite of the Market? The Envestnet Edge, May 2017 Video: Invest "As If" The Envestnet Edge, April 2017 Video: What To Do In Quiet Markets The Envestnet Edge, March 2017 Video: Bull Or Bear: Should Investors Still Care? PMC Weekly Review - March 10, 2017 The Envestnet Edge, February 2017 Video: Separating markets from politics, is it really a "Trump rally"? The Envestnet Edge, January 2017 Video: Investing in Trump’s Economy? Proceed With Caution The Envestnet Edge, December 2016 Video: Have We Only Just Begun? The Envestnet Edge, November 2016 Video: Rotations, Reversals, Rising Rates: A Time to Reposition Post-Election, Will Markets and Portfolios Emerge Winners or Losers? Webinar Replay: Post-Election Winners and Losers The Envestnet Edge, October 2016 Video: In a 2-2-2 world, look for modest economic growth and expansion PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, September 2016 Video: Diversification is working in 2016 (so far) The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2016 Video: Valuations: it's all relative Brexit: Plunging into the Unknown? The Envestnet Edge, June 2016 Video: Equity valuations and bond yields: reach no further PMC Weekly Review - June 17, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, May 2016 Video: Hitting singles: a measured approach for this investing season The Envestnet Edge, April 2016 Video: Investing with impact: increasingly a matter-of-fact Video: In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers? The Envestnet Edge, March 2016 PMC Weekly Review - March 11, 2016 Video: In a low-growth world, less could be more The Envestnet Edge, February 2016 The Envestnet Edge, January 2016 Video: Markets are a mess, but don't jump to conclusions yet A Most Challenging Year Video: Interest Rates and Energy: The Highs and Lows of Year-End The Envestnet Edge, December 2015 The Envestnet Edge, November 2015 Video: We'll always have Paris The Envestnet Edge, October 2015 Video: Politics and the markets: déjà vu all over again? Video: China, Commodities, and Crisis: What's Next for Emerging Markets? The Envestnet Edge, September 2015 PMC Weekly Review - September 11, 2015 Is This The Big One (Financially Speaking)? Probably Not. The Envestnet Edge, August 2015 Video: In a "meh" market, look again at U.S. stocks The Envestnet Edge, July 2015 Video: Is this the Big One? What to do in a financial crisis Don't Worry About China Don’t Believe the Hype About Greece The Greek Catastrophe Is Finally Here (Unless It Isn’t) The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2015 Video: When Following the Herd is Risky, Where is the Safety? The Envestnet Edge, April 2015 Video: The End of Short-Termism is Long Overdue PMC Weekly Review - April 24, 2015 The Envestnet Edge, March 2015 Video: Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisor Closer The Envestnet Edge, February 2015 Video: The Return of the Comeback: Is 2015 the Year for International Stocks? PMC Weekly Review - February 13, 2015 Why the Jobs Report Means Diddly Don’t Turn America Into Europe PMC Weekly Review - January 23, 2015 Video: Active and Passive: The Yin and Yang of Investing The Envestnet Edge, January 2015 PMC Weekly Review - January 9, 2015 Will Politics in 2015 Catch Up with the Economy? Video: Our Perspective on 2015: Maintain Yours The Envestnet Edge, December 2014 PMC Market Commentary: December 12, 2014 No, This Is NOT the '90s Economy Again PMC Market Commentary: November 14, 2014 Video: 2014 U.S. Midterms: A Win for Stocks? The Envestnet Edge, November 2014 Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016? PMC Market Commentary: October 17, 2014 Video: Special Video Commentary: Market Volatility and Fundamentals The Envestnet Edge, October 2014 Video: You Know What’s Not Sustainable? Ignoring the Opportunity in Impact Investing Don’t Panic! PMC Market Commentary: October 10, 2014 Greenberg’s Folly Naomi Klein Is Wrong PMC Market Commentary: September 26, 2014 Subprime Loans Are Back! Video: When it Comes to Interest Rates, Who Says What Comes Down Must Go Up? The Envestnet Edge, September 2014 PMC Market Commentary: September 12, 2014 Why Indie Bookstores Are on the Rise Again The Fed Is Not As Powerful As We Think PMC Market Commentary: August 22, 2014 Americans' Sour Mood on the Economy Doesn't Square with the Fact The Envestnet Edge, August 2014 Video: The World is in Crisis... the Markets are not PMC Market Commentary: August 8, 2014 PMC Market Commentary: July 25, 2014 Punitive Damages Video: Market Valuations and The Theory of Relativity The Envestnet Edge, July 2014 Don’t Kill the Export-Import Bank. Clone It. How India’s Economic Rise Could Bolster America’s Economy Video: Separating Risk from Reality PMC Market Commentary: June 27, 2014 No Sex Please, We're French PMC Market Commentary: June 13, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, June 2014 PMC Weekly Market Review, May 23, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, May 2014 Don't Bet on Rising Wages PMC Market Commentary: May 9, 2014 The Sharing Economy: Why Are So Many So Afraid? PMC Market Commentary: April 25, 2014 The Obsession with CEO Pay Won't Help the Middle Class PMC Market Commentary: April 11, 2014 Time to Face Reality: Our Unemployment Problems Are Structural PMC Market Commentary: March 28, 2014 In Defense of Relentless Optimism The "Made in China" Fallacy Forget GDP - Use Big Data