Commentaries

The Envestnet Edge, March 2016

In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers?

Download the full PDF

Investors have been subjected to stinging election rhetoric, with more of the same to come.  Making meaningful investment decisions based on its prospective outcome is a challenge.  Is it productive to try?

Let’s just get this out of the way: the bulk of this year will be consumed by election noise. There is no way around that. That noise, in turn, will drive out other stories, unless there is a major disruptive event (a terrorist attack, a natural disaster, unexpected political upheaval in the world, or expectations of a possible Brexit coming to fruition). That noise also will subtly influence investors’ behavior, or at least how they view the world. There is no way to avoid that.

But, we can be diligent about how much to connect the dots of campaign rhetoric and expectations, and whether to extend them into actual policies that might dramatically alter the trajectory of economic growth, markets, and investing.

We are in a year of election mania, very modestly rising short-term interest rates, and unresolved questions about the price of oil. The net effect has been intense volatility at the beginning of the year followed by a month of recovery and placidity. It’s highly unlikely that volatility has dissipated, but it is also likely that its intensity may have been exaggerated. In truth, we’ve had almost a year of markets adjusting, not to elections, but to the changed dynamics of oil and commodities and to the prospect of a soft end to highly accommodative U.S. central bank policy. Markets shifted—often wildly—as that happened, but year over year, we are essentially flat: The S&P 500 in late-March 2016 is almost exactly where it was in late-March 2015. With the impending election noise, we may be in for more of the same—lots of arm waving and skittishness, but not much actual movement.
    
How elections affect markets

As is the wont of Wall Street analysts and mavens, many attempts have been made to discern a historical pattern that offers clues of what to expect in an election year. Those patterns suggest that the fourth year of a second-term president (i.e. an election year where the incumbent is not standing for re-election) is among the worst years for equities over the past century, with an average decline of -1.2%.

That would seem to be a rather emphatic pattern, except that the declines are rarely major, and the pattern is not all that it seems. There have been only six times when a second term president did not run for reelection since 1920 (or seven if you count Lyndon Johnson): Calvin Coolidge in 1928; Harry Truman in 1952; Dwight Eisenhower in 1960; Ronald Reagan in 1988; William Clinton in 2000; and George W. Bush in 2008. That is hardly a significant number of data points, and insufficient to come to any actionable conclusions about the arc of markets this year.

Also unclear, by the by, is how a modestly rising rate environment affects equities. There, too, attempts have been made to find clear and discernible patterns. It’s often said that rising rates lead to declining stocks, as investors flock to higher returns with lower volatility that higher-yielding fixed income seems to provide. But although there is some evidence of that investor behavior at certain periods in the past, the relationship between rates and equities has been tenuous, at best, in more recent periods.

Then there is the issue of what candidate X might do should he or she become president. In any given presidential cycle, analysts take the various policy promises and platforms and try to assess what the sector and profit implications might be. These implications tend to be particularly acute when it comes to the health care sector, where government policy dictates Medicare/Medicaid rules and reimbursement rates. Other favored areas include gaming the implications of tax policy and environmental and financial regulations.

Here as well, however, you would be hard pressed to show that any of this analysis has been especially helpful. You can certainly attempt to trade the expectations, but a few points should be considered.

First, there have been remarkably few pieces of legislation that substantially changed the landscape of an entire industry. As Congress has become more polarized, there have been fewer bills of major consequence to entire industries. With the political landscape now shaping up as it is, it would take a radical shift to foresee any major legislation in the next three years akin to the Affordable Care Act.

Yes, Congress continues to authorize considerable spending, and for sure, the details of the Pentagon budget affect the revenue of the major defense companies such as Boeing, Lockheed, and General Dynamics, just as medical reimbursement rates have an impact on Pfizer, et al. But even so, it is very hard to gauge exactly how that impact will shape overall earnings.

In addition, some regulations do, of course, shape businesses. The fiduciary standard emerging in the financial services world looks to accelerate the shift away from commission-based and more towards fee-based business, but even here, the precise revenue implications for publicly traded financial service firms are extremely difficult to model, given the number of variables and unknowns.

It is vital to keep these realities in mind as analysts start to issue reports gauging how a candidate’s promises, if enacted, will alter earnings of companies or overall economic activity. Take Donald Trump’s assertion that he will strive to slap a 35% tariff on goods imported as a result of U.S. companies outsourcing production, whether that is Carrier air conditioners or Apple iPhones. Certainly, that would have a major effect on the domestic price of those goods. But it is almost impossible to imagine a scenario in which Congress would implement such a tax, and hence modeling that scenario is in many ways a waste of time.

Elections matter, and they don’t

Presidential elections are among the most consequential decisions we collectively make in the United States. But their impact on the arc of economic life has been vastly overstated. Never say never, and this year is certainly shaping up as an odd and atypical one. Even so, until there is more than rhetorical evidence and speculation about how the outcome will shape the future, it is wise to distinguish between the campaign and the markets.

For now, Wall Street and global investors appear sanguine about the election, and that is for the best. Markets have seen a major rotation out of energy and commodities and a sell-off in industrial and financial names that are directly exposed to those negative trends. Even that appears to have abated, which leaves us in a remarkably static position juxtaposed against ongoing political drama. In short, it’s a good time to think in terms of the longer-term future, to see which companies are poised to benefit from the continued evolution towards services and technology, and to adjust to a low-rate, low-inflation world. It’s theoretically possible that the outcome of the election will change those calculations, but it’s also very unlikely.

Advisor Takeaway:

Election noise can subtly influence investor behavior. Analysts like to draw parallels between election years and market performance, but meaningful data is scant, at best. The same can be said for how markets behave in a slowly rising rate environment. Elections matter, but how they affect economic life has often been overstated. As markets have rotated out of commodities, a long-term view is in order.  A more productive use of time may be examining which companies will benefit from the shift to services and technology in a low-rate, low-inflation world.

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this commentary is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and their returns assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet | PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet | PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2016 Envestnet, Inc. All rights reserved.

Featuring

Zachary Karabell
Head of Global Strategies, Envestnet, Inc., Consultant to Investment Committee*

Articles By This Author

The Envestnet Edge, September 2017 Video: Time To Take A (Measured) Risk? The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2017 Video: Bitcoin: Buy Or Buyer Beware? The Envestnet Edge, June 2017 Video: FANG, FAAMG: Too Big a Bite of the Market? The Envestnet Edge, May 2017 Video: Invest "As If" The Envestnet Edge, April 2017 Video: What To Do In Quiet Markets The Envestnet Edge, March 2017 Video: Bull Or Bear: Should Investors Still Care? PMC Weekly Review - March 10, 2017 The Envestnet Edge, February 2017 Video: Separating markets from politics, is it really a "Trump rally"? The Envestnet Edge, January 2017 Video: Investing in Trump’s Economy? Proceed With Caution The Envestnet Edge, December 2016 Video: Have We Only Just Begun? The Envestnet Edge, November 2016 Video: Rotations, Reversals, Rising Rates: A Time to Reposition Post-Election, Will Markets and Portfolios Emerge Winners or Losers? Webinar Replay: Post-Election Winners and Losers The Envestnet Edge, October 2016 Video: In a 2-2-2 world, look for modest economic growth and expansion PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, September 2016 Video: Diversification is working in 2016 (so far) The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2016 Video: Valuations: it's all relative Brexit: Plunging into the Unknown? The Envestnet Edge, June 2016 Video: Equity valuations and bond yields: reach no further PMC Weekly Review - June 17, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, May 2016 Video: Hitting singles: a measured approach for this investing season The Envestnet Edge, April 2016 Video: Investing with impact: increasingly a matter-of-fact Video: In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers? The Envestnet Edge, March 2016 PMC Weekly Review - March 11, 2016 Video: In a low-growth world, less could be more The Envestnet Edge, February 2016 The Envestnet Edge, January 2016 Video: Markets are a mess, but don't jump to conclusions yet A Most Challenging Year Video: Interest Rates and Energy: The Highs and Lows of Year-End The Envestnet Edge, December 2015 The Envestnet Edge, November 2015 Video: We'll always have Paris The Envestnet Edge, October 2015 Video: Politics and the markets: déjà vu all over again? Video: China, Commodities, and Crisis: What's Next for Emerging Markets? The Envestnet Edge, September 2015 PMC Weekly Review - September 11, 2015 Is This The Big One (Financially Speaking)? Probably Not. The Envestnet Edge, August 2015 Video: In a "meh" market, look again at U.S. stocks The Envestnet Edge, July 2015 Video: Is this the Big One? What to do in a financial crisis Don't Worry About China Don’t Believe the Hype About Greece The Greek Catastrophe Is Finally Here (Unless It Isn’t) The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2015 Video: When Following the Herd is Risky, Where is the Safety? The Envestnet Edge, April 2015 Video: The End of Short-Termism is Long Overdue PMC Weekly Review - April 24, 2015 The Envestnet Edge, March 2015 Video: Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisor Closer The Envestnet Edge, February 2015 Video: The Return of the Comeback: Is 2015 the Year for International Stocks? PMC Weekly Review - February 13, 2015 Why the Jobs Report Means Diddly Don’t Turn America Into Europe PMC Weekly Review - January 23, 2015 Video: Active and Passive: The Yin and Yang of Investing The Envestnet Edge, January 2015 PMC Weekly Review - January 9, 2015 Will Politics in 2015 Catch Up with the Economy? Video: Our Perspective on 2015: Maintain Yours The Envestnet Edge, December 2014 PMC Market Commentary: December 12, 2014 No, This Is NOT the '90s Economy Again PMC Market Commentary: November 14, 2014 Video: 2014 U.S. Midterms: A Win for Stocks? The Envestnet Edge, November 2014 Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016? PMC Market Commentary: October 17, 2014 Video: Special Video Commentary: Market Volatility and Fundamentals The Envestnet Edge, October 2014 Video: You Know What’s Not Sustainable? Ignoring the Opportunity in Impact Investing Don’t Panic! PMC Market Commentary: October 10, 2014 Greenberg’s Folly Naomi Klein Is Wrong PMC Market Commentary: September 26, 2014 Subprime Loans Are Back! Video: When it Comes to Interest Rates, Who Says What Comes Down Must Go Up? The Envestnet Edge, September 2014 PMC Market Commentary: September 12, 2014 Why Indie Bookstores Are on the Rise Again The Fed Is Not As Powerful As We Think PMC Market Commentary: August 22, 2014 Americans' Sour Mood on the Economy Doesn't Square with the Fact The Envestnet Edge, August 2014 Video: The World is in Crisis... the Markets are not PMC Market Commentary: August 8, 2014 PMC Market Commentary: July 25, 2014 Punitive Damages Video: Market Valuations and The Theory of Relativity The Envestnet Edge, July 2014 Don’t Kill the Export-Import Bank. Clone It. How India’s Economic Rise Could Bolster America’s Economy Video: Separating Risk from Reality PMC Market Commentary: June 27, 2014 No Sex Please, We're French PMC Market Commentary: June 13, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, June 2014 PMC Weekly Market Review, May 23, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, May 2014 Don't Bet on Rising Wages PMC Market Commentary: May 9, 2014 The Sharing Economy: Why Are So Many So Afraid? PMC Market Commentary: April 25, 2014 The Obsession with CEO Pay Won't Help the Middle Class PMC Market Commentary: April 11, 2014 Time to Face Reality: Our Unemployment Problems Are Structural PMC Market Commentary: March 28, 2014 In Defense of Relentless Optimism The "Made in China" Fallacy Forget GDP - Use Big Data