The Envestnet Edge, February 2016

In a low-growth world, less could be more

Download the full PDF

Investments are no longer generating the average annual returns that investors have become accustomed to for over the past 100 years, and people are rightly unsettled. But in a world in which there is lower growth, inflation, and costs, it is entirely reasonable to expect that annual returns might be lower, as well.

Step away from the intense bouts of volatility that recently have characterized financial markets, and an important trend emerges that is unsettling investors large and small. With few exceptions, investments simply are not generating the average annual returns that they’ve come to expect.

That reality has led to no dearth of handwringing, brow-furling, and expletive-laced protests. Last year, nearly every combination of investments (save for the Nasdaq domestically or Japanese equities internationally) either lost money or returned next to nothing. In spite of that fact, most investors continue to expect not just more than zero (a reasonable goal) but something approximating the returns they experienced for much of the latter decades of the 20th century. And that is not reasonable at all.

The world we are entering is messy and mysterious, but a few facts seem in order: it is a world of lower growth, lower inflation, lower returns, and lower costs. Some of these aspects may appear, at first glance, to be negative, e.g. lower growth. But those negatives are powerfully offset by the positives of lower inflation and lower costs. Net net, therefore, this near future allows for decent real returns, even if the headline numbers are less gaudy.

What is imperative, however, is that investors of all stripes reset their expectations. Unless that happens, they are likely to be disappointed, disillusioned, and dismayed, and seek higher returns via investments that will carry more risk and may deliver less performance. It’s neither a good combination, nor a necessary one.

The past is not prologue

For the 100 years between 1915 and 2015, the S&P 500 averaged nearly 10% annual returns. And it is fair to say that a vast number of investors, ranging from day traders to sober institutional managers, continue to use that number as a fair target. Since the early 1980s, bonds have returned more than 8% annually to investors. That alone explains why similar assumptions about the next decades persist, and why return expectations were set at those levels.

Those expectations matter, especially for large pension plans. Although there are fewer corporate defined benefit plans today than existed in the late 20th century, there are still trillions of dollars in public plans and endowments.

But today’s world has shifted into a decidedly different growth trajectory. Growth remains relatively strong in the developing world, but is distinctly slower than it was from 2000-2013, dipping under 5% this year. Growth in the United States, the Eurozone, and Japan, which at about $40 trillion still make up more than half of global output, has slowed to less than 2.5%. Global interest rates are almost everywhere in decline, with sovereign yields in the developed world (which make up the bulk of issuance) well under 2%, and in many cases, under 1%. In addition, inflation is almost everywhere in the developed world non-existent, well below 2%, and fading in the developing world as well, including China.

Companies have, it is true, continued to generate profits well in excess of global growth, though that too may be shifting. For now, overall profit growth of the S&P 500 is flat to down because of the implosion of energy and commodity corporate earnings, and it is too soon to tell whether that collapse will spread chronically to other sectors. Regardless, the overall rate of annual corporate earnings growth could well be declining from double digits to high single digits.

That is the world now. The problem is that return expectations are not grounded in the world of today—they are lodged in yesterday.

Over the past decade, the return assumptions of state and local pension plans have indeed come down—by a whopping 37 basis points, from just over 8% in 2001 to 7.68% at last report. Plans are resetting their expectations downwards, but at the glacial pace that one would expect from large institutions. And that pace is far too slow in a world that is changing far too fast. A move of less than half a percent is, at the very least, not much, given how much the growth profile of the world has shifted.

And yes, some select endowments, especially university funds such as the famed Yale endowment, have continued to generate gaudy double-digit returns based on a heavy exposure to alternative and direct investments in hedge funds, private equity, and real assets. Even here, however, the trend line has been down: returns are still well above market returns, but the gap is closing.

It is, of course, quite possible that the world will shift back into a higher-return profile at some point. It also is possible that the many critics of the current environment are correct: that it is a product of overly loose central banks that are artificially distorting price signals and keeping rates and returns low. Both are possible, but may not be probable.

In the face of what we know—that growth is slowing and prices are dropping—juxtaposed against the uncertainty about that which we do not, it would be prudent to lower our expectations. The advantage of doing so is that rather than reaching for returns that can only be achieved by assuming more risk or more margin and more exposure, we accept a lower threshold. If that threshold is met, great, and if it is surpassed, even better, but it then will be surpassed not because of assuming excessive risk but because of stronger markets and their underlying fundamentals.

The silver lining, and a very shiny one it is

If this were a call just to deal with it and accept lower returns, that would be cold gruel. But there is a silver lining here, and not an insubstantial one: this lower returns world is unfolding in a time in which costs are plunging, inflation is tepid, and interest rates (hence the cost of capital) are incredibly low.

Those years when the average returns were 8%, 9%, 10% were by and large years when inflation was 4%, 5%, or in the 1970s, 10% or more. They were years when interest rates averaged 5% or 6% or again even more, on average, and that made the cost of capital, and thus doing business or buying a home, much dearer. In short, for much of that time the positive effects of high returns were offset by the negative effects of rising inflation and high interest rates. High rates did generate more yield for investors, but that higher yield then was offset by higher real world costs.

In that sense, lower returns today can have the same net effect as higher returns did for thirty years. It is the same principle as “real income,” which adjusts for costs. Today’s 5%, therefore, may seem paltry compared to yesteryear’s 10%, but that is only because we so often fail to integrate the larger context, which must include inflation, costs, and interest rates. This “new normal” of lower returns may feel like a comedown, but that is because returns are being analyzed in an abstract vacuum, when instead they should be evaluated within the context of those other variables.

Less may not feel as good as more does in a culture that has been primed to expect more. But in the world we are entering, lower returns may be just as tenable and add as much value as higher returns did in an earlier time. At a minimum, it is a conversation we need to have, and a debate that demands more attention.

February Take-Away:

For many decades, the S&P averaged 10% annual returns while bonds averaged 8%. In today’s world, lower growth, lower inflation, lower costs, and lower corporate earnings all translate to lower returns. But this “new normal” has a silver lining: lower returns are juxtaposed against lower inflation, costs, and interest rates, making it less expensive to do business or buy a home. Rather than succumb to the temptation to assume more risk to chase higher returns, prudent investors will recognize that in today’s world, lower returns can add just as much value as higher returns did in yesteryear. They will want to realign their return expectations in the context of the world we live in today.

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this commentary is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and their returns assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet | PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet | PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2016 Envestnet, Inc. All rights reserved.


Articles By This Author

The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2018 Video: Five (Investing) Rules To Live By The Envestnet Edge, March/April 2018 Video: Buy The Dips Video: No Place Like Home? Market Bias Perceptions and Realities The Envestnet Edge, February 2018 The Envestnet Edge, January 2018 Video: Raging or Aging: How Much Longer Will the Bull Last? Webinar Replay: 2018 Market Outlook The Envestnet Edge, December 2017 Video: Bitcoin, Bubbles, and the Bigger Picture The Envestnet Edge, November 2017 Video: Taxes are certain, but don't obsess about tax reform The Envestnet Edge, October 2017 Video: Time to stock up on growth or value? The Envestnet Edge, September 2017 Video: Time To Take A (Measured) Risk? The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2017 Video: Bitcoin: Buy Or Buyer Beware? The Envestnet Edge, June 2017 Video: FANG, FAAMG: Too Big a Bite of the Market? The Envestnet Edge, May 2017 Video: Invest "As If" The Envestnet Edge, April 2017 Video: What To Do In Quiet Markets The Envestnet Edge, March 2017 Video: Bull Or Bear: Should Investors Still Care? PMC Weekly Review - March 10, 2017 The Envestnet Edge, February 2017 Video: Separating markets from politics, is it really a "Trump rally"? The Envestnet Edge, January 2017 Video: Investing in Trump’s Economy? Proceed With Caution The Envestnet Edge, December 2016 Video: Have We Only Just Begun? The Envestnet Edge, November 2016 Video: Rotations, Reversals, Rising Rates: A Time to Reposition Post-Election, Will Markets and Portfolios Emerge Winners or Losers? Webinar Replay: Post-Election Winners and Losers The Envestnet Edge, October 2016 Video: In a 2-2-2 world, look for modest economic growth and expansion PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, September 2016 Video: Diversification is working in 2016 (so far) The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2016 Video: Valuations: it's all relative Brexit: Plunging into the Unknown? The Envestnet Edge, June 2016 Video: Equity valuations and bond yields: reach no further PMC Weekly Review - June 17, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, May 2016 Video: Hitting singles: a measured approach for this investing season The Envestnet Edge, April 2016 Video: Investing with impact: increasingly a matter-of-fact Video: In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers? The Envestnet Edge, March 2016 PMC Weekly Review - March 11, 2016 Video: In a low-growth world, less could be more The Envestnet Edge, February 2016 The Envestnet Edge, January 2016 Video: Markets are a mess, but don't jump to conclusions yet A Most Challenging Year Video: Interest Rates and Energy: The Highs and Lows of Year-End The Envestnet Edge, December 2015 The Envestnet Edge, November 2015 Video: We'll always have Paris The Envestnet Edge, October 2015 Video: Politics and the markets: déjà vu all over again? Video: China, Commodities, and Crisis: What's Next for Emerging Markets? The Envestnet Edge, September 2015 PMC Weekly Review - September 11, 2015 Is This The Big One (Financially Speaking)? Probably Not. The Envestnet Edge, August 2015 Video: In a "meh" market, look again at U.S. stocks The Envestnet Edge, July 2015 Video: Is this the Big One? What to do in a financial crisis Don't Worry About China Don’t Believe the Hype About Greece The Greek Catastrophe Is Finally Here (Unless It Isn’t) The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2015 Video: When Following the Herd is Risky, Where is the Safety? The Envestnet Edge, April 2015 Video: The End of Short-Termism is Long Overdue PMC Weekly Review - April 24, 2015 The Envestnet Edge, March 2015 Video: Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisor Closer The Envestnet Edge, February 2015 Video: The Return of the Comeback: Is 2015 the Year for International Stocks? PMC Weekly Review - February 13, 2015 Why the Jobs Report Means Diddly Don’t Turn America Into Europe PMC Weekly Review - January 23, 2015 Video: Active and Passive: The Yin and Yang of Investing The Envestnet Edge, January 2015 Will Politics in 2015 Catch Up with the Economy? Video: Our Perspective on 2015: Maintain Yours The Envestnet Edge, December 2014 PMC Market Commentary: December 12, 2014 No, This Is NOT the '90s Economy Again PMC Market Commentary: November 14, 2014 Video: 2014 U.S. Midterms: A Win for Stocks? The Envestnet Edge, November 2014 Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016? PMC Market Commentary: October 17, 2014 Video: Special Video Commentary: Market Volatility and Fundamentals The Envestnet Edge, October 2014 Don’t Panic! Video: You Know What’s Not Sustainable? Ignoring the Opportunity in Impact Investing PMC Market Commentary: October 10, 2014 Greenberg’s Folly Naomi Klein Is Wrong PMC Market Commentary: September 26, 2014 Subprime Loans Are Back! Video: When it Comes to Interest Rates, Who Says What Comes Down Must Go Up? The Envestnet Edge, September 2014 PMC Market Commentary: September 12, 2014 Why Indie Bookstores Are on the Rise Again The Fed Is Not As Powerful As We Think PMC Market Commentary: August 22, 2014 Americans' Sour Mood on the Economy Doesn't Square with the Fact The Envestnet Edge, August 2014 Video: The World is in Crisis... the Markets are not PMC Market Commentary: August 8, 2014 PMC Market Commentary: July 25, 2014 Punitive Damages Video: Market Valuations and The Theory of Relativity The Envestnet Edge, July 2014 Don’t Kill the Export-Import Bank. Clone It. How India’s Economic Rise Could Bolster America’s Economy Video: Separating Risk from Reality PMC Market Commentary: June 27, 2014 No Sex Please, We're French PMC Market Commentary: June 13, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, June 2014 PMC Weekly Market Review, May 23, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, May 2014 Don't Bet on Rising Wages PMC Market Commentary: May 9, 2014 The Sharing Economy: Why Are So Many So Afraid? PMC Market Commentary: April 25, 2014 The Obsession with CEO Pay Won't Help the Middle Class PMC Market Commentary: April 11, 2014 Time to Face Reality: Our Unemployment Problems Are Structural PMC Market Commentary: March 28, 2014 In Defense of Relentless Optimism The "Made in China" Fallacy Forget GDP - Use Big Data