PMC Weekly Review – January 28, 2019

Is There a Mouse in the House?

Since the financial crisis in 2008, home prices have been on an upward, one-way trajectory. According to the Federal Reserve (the Fed), the median price of a home sold in the US bottomed out in Q12009 at $208,400, and as of Q32018, was up to $325,200, representing a 56% increase. Beginning in the summer of 2018, the West, the country’s most expensive real estate region, actually experienced a decline in home prices. The Pending Home Sales Index (PHSI) is used as a leading indicator by the National Association of Realtors (NAR), and counts the number of contracts that were signed rather than actual closed sales. When the PHSI was released for November 2018, the index was down 7.7%, representing the sharpest year-over-year decline since June 2014. In fact, all four of the index’s regions (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West) were down year over year, igniting debate as to what could cause the decline and whether it will persist.

One possible explanation is the rise in interest rates. In November 2011, 30-year fixed mortgage rates hit their low at 3.32%, but had spiked up to 4.86% by October 2018. As of January 2019, 30-year fixed mortgage rates have receded, dropping to 4.45%, and alleviating some pressure on the cost of financing a home. However, the housing market seems to be much more sensitive to any movement in rates than in the past, despite the fact that they are still low on a historical basis, with the roughly 1% change in rates between 2011 and 2018 representing a more than 25% increase in the cost of financing.

Another possible explanation lies with wages. Beginning in January 2009, after the federal funds rate was near zero, nominal wage growth averaged 2.29%. During this same time period, the median household income grew 7.65% from $57,010 to $61,372. For wages to keep up with the price of homes, the median household income would need to be nearly $89,000. It is clear that slow wage growth along with a rapid increase in home prices may have squeezed some potential buyers out of the market entirely.

The current monthly supply of houses in the US is as high as it has been since August 2011, indicating that demand is declining, even though more recent wage growth has ticked up to more than 3% and rates have fallen slightly. This may signal concern that the decline in demand is influenced by themes outside of rates, slow wage growth, and increases in home prices.

The Fed recently highlighted the effects of soaring student loan debt on home purchases. Total student debt now sits at $1.5 trillion, higher than credit card and auto loan debt combined. This increasing debt burden has hamstrung graduates and possibly deprived them of the ability to save for a down payment. According to the Fed, homeownership by people ages 24 to 32 fell 9% between 2005 and 2014. The Fed looked at this time period due to the spike in delinquencies, which hurt credit reports and further complicated qualifying for a mortgage.

Short-term disruptions also have been to blame for the decline. The current federal government shutdown (the longest in history), has affected around 800,000 employees. Any plans these employees might have to buy a home surely would be curtailed by the uncertainty of working without pay, further squeezing another potential home-buying demographic out of the market.

The housing market in the US has enjoyed a strong recovery since the financial crisis, and during that time, homeowners have seen a drastic increase in the value of their homes. The current pullback may not totally curb the housing market’s future growth potential. However, the rapid increase in the prices of homes (which has not been met with commensurate wage growth), combined with massive student debt, the increasing cost of capital, and furloughed federal workers, certainly may put pressure on the housing market. It also may weigh on the most valuable asset of most consumers, whose overall spending accounts for roughly two-thirds of the US economy.

Brandon Rick,
Investment Analyst

Download the full PDF


The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2019 Envestnet. All rights reserved.