Commentaries

PMC Weekly Review – April 29, 2019

A Macro View – Is this the Wrong Summer for a Road Trip?

As the summer months approach, it is time for the usual rise in gas prices. This seasonal trend is normal, as demand for gas increases with the warming weather. In addition, this is when the changeover to the more expensive summer-blend gasoline occurs, and most refineries cut production as they complete their maintenance for the year. Unfortunately for those planning cross-country road trips this summer, the price hike may be steeper than usual. Gasoline across the country has spiked an average of 23 cents to $2.84 a gallon over just the last month. This is 8 cents higher than where prices were a year ago. Several different reasons contribute to this, but in general, seasonal changes are coupling with the already rising oil prices that have persisted since the start of 2019. Unfortunately, this could be just the beginning, especially after the Trump Administration announced last week that it would not extend the waivers that were put in place last November, allowing certain countries to continue importing oil from Iran. This news came as somewhat of a surprise, as some expected the waivers to be extended.

Taking a step back to provide some context, these waivers were a byproduct of the US’s pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal in May of last year. After the US withdrew, sanctions imposed prior to the agreement against both Iran and those countries that do business with them were reinstated. Those countries had 180 days from the May withdrawal date to stop purchasing oil from Iran and to find alternative sources. The goal was to cut Iran oil exports to zero by November, but some exceptions were made as the November deadline approached. Eight countries, including China, India, Greece, Italy, Taiwan, Japan, Turkey, and South Korea, were given an additional 180 days to reduce their imports gradually. The deadline to extend these waivers was May 2 of this year, and some assumed that the US government would extend the waivers on or before this date. On Monday, the Administration announced that this will not be the case, and Iranian oil purchases must cease by May 2.

The disruption this will cause cannot be denied, as Iran exported around 1.3 million barrels of oil per day in both March and February. This announcement puts heavy pressure on countries relying on Iran’s oil, some of whom expected these waivers would be extended. For countries such as Italy, Greece, and Taiwan, who have already stopped importing oil from Iran, this decision will not be problematic. The same cannot be said for some Asian countries that heavily rely on these imports. China, Iran’s largest oil customer, imported about 500,000 barrels per day in February and March. India, the second largest consumer, has been sticking to an agreement to import no more than 300,000 barrels per day.

Besides disruption to the countries using this oil, the decision raises concern about its effect on the overall oil market, and more specifically, its impact on gas prices. White House officials are suggesting that this will not affect oil prices, and that production in the US and Saudi Arabia will make up the difference. Although consumers hope this will be the case, several other factors currently govern oil supply. First, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its partners, including Russia, slashed oil production at the start of the year. After oil values tanked last December, and in response to oversupply, OPEC made large reductions in oil output beginning in 2019. These cuts are to be revisited in June, but no official decisions have been made. Venezuela and Libya are two other variables influencing the market. Venezuela’s political issues along with sanctions from the US have depleted production, and persistent political turmoil and fighting have disrupted Libya’s output.

With the price of crude oil already up 40% this year, and both intentional and unintentional supply tightening from various parties, where will things go from here? The US’s recent announcement resulted in a 2.9% surge in oil prices, bringing crude oil to a six-month high of $74 a barrel on Monday. Although this may be just the market’s short-term reaction, several factors weigh on the supply of oil, indicating that prices will continue to increase. As the Trump Administration looks to calm the public, what the rest of the year (and especially the summer months) have in store for our gas prices remains uncertain. But this may not be the summer to take the cross-country road trip, as predicting just how high oil prices will rise in the upcoming months depends on too many variables right now.

Christine Kirk
Investment Analyst

 

Download the full PDF

 

Sources:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-22/oil-extends-gains-after-u-s-rules-out-waivers-beyond-may-expiry

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/22/world/middleeast/us-iran-oil-sanctions-.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-04-22/how-trump-s-stifling-of-iran-waivers-affects-the-opec-oil-cuts

https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-issue-eight-waivers-for-oil-countries-under-iran-sanctions-1541172994?mod=article_inline&mod=article_inline&mod=article_inline

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-oil-opec-meeting/opec-likely-to-defer-output-policy-decision-until-june-sources-idUSKCN1QL1D4

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-gas-price-gallon-1403966

Inquiries

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/world/middleeast/trump-iran-nuclear-deal.html

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/15/world/middleeast/us-china-india-venezuela-iran-oil.html

 

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

© 2019 Envestnet. All rights reserved.