The Envestnet Edge, January 2018

Raging or Aging: How Much Longer Will the Bull Last?​

Download the full PDF

The surging stock market appears to be making investors nervous. Is their concern justified? This month, we compare today’s market to past bull markets, and examine current volatility and valuations. Evidence suggests that despite excessive global debt, the fragility of a few countries, and investor anxiety, this bull market may be merely middle aged rather than past its prime.

A recent lead article in The Wall Street Journal neatly encapsulated many investors’ concern that equity markets, which have started the year in robust fashion (the S&P 500 was up more than 5% for the first four weeks of the year), are now so frothy that they invite comparisons to the memorable bubbles of the late 1990s. With valuations now well above 20th century averages, and the bull market entering its ninth year, increasing numbers of market participants appear to be getting nervous.

Those concerns may prove entirely warranted, but the logic is flawed, and for several reasons. The length of the current bull market is not particularly notable; volatility is not a threat to long-term gains unless it is an early warning sign of structural weakness, which is not evident at the moment; and valuations are high only if looked at in isolation. In addition, at almost no point in the past eight-plus years of equity strength have retail investors been much in evidence, and market participants have been chronically uneasy. Those have never been features of past bubbles.

Long in the tooth? Hardly.

The cliché that this current equity bull market is looking old, or long in the tooth, has been a consistent refrain for years. Just Google it. But truly, nine years is not an “old” bull market. It is, at best, middle aged. Many in middle age do indeed succumb to sudden and unexpected demises—too much red meat, watching too much football in lazy chairs, you know the drill—but many live decades more, even as relatives and friends look on in wonder.

Take the last major US equity bull market, which lasted from about 1982 until early 2000. That was, by our calculation, 18 years, or more than double the length of the current market, which is said to have begun in March of 2009. During that earlier run, there was one down year (1990, when the S&P 500 fell about 3%), and a few single-digit years (1987, 1992, and 1994). The period 1995-2000 posted gains above 20% every year, and above 30% for two of those.

By comparison, the recent run in US stocks (and since about 2011, in global equities as well) is almost modest. It’s been a good stretch for sure, but one that until 2016 also came with some wild and sharp swings of volatility that hit different sectors at different times. In the case of commodity stocks in 2015, or the fast sell-off in tech stocks that ushered in 2016, those volatile corrections often generated losses of 20%-30% in those companies’ stocks.

In a related vein, from the early 1960s until 1982, stocks were in what we now identify as a relative bear market, even though there were years with substantial gains (in excess of 20%) followed by years that fell by equal amounts. That period of back-and-forth, neither feast nor famine, lasted nearly 20 years. Or take the bond market from 1982 until 2015, led by the U.S. 10-year Treasury Note. In 1982, sparked by then-Chairman of the Federal Reserve Paul Volker’s aggressive moves to attack inflation, rates peaked above 14%. By 1988, they were down to 8%, and by the mid 1990s, below 7%. Starting in 2000, they fell below 6%, then below 5%, and then dropped below 2% by the beginning of 2015. That is a 33-year bull market in bonds, which appears to have ended at last.

A nine-year bull market, with much skepticism and precious little retail participation (as assessed by various on-line brokerages, trading commissions, and other inputs, such as Gallup surveys), is thus hardly long in the tooth. It is perhaps middle aged, and of course could end at any moment, but its length is not a cause for concern, no matter how many people say that over and over.

What of volatility?

Another frequent refrain these days is that we are due for a return to volatility. It is certainly true that market volatility, as measured by the VIX, has been remarkably low the past year plus (Figure 2). It feels even lower, given just how spikey and high volatility was during the great financial crisis and in the years after. Oodles of traders and quantitative funds designed strategies around volatility, and they saw flush times between 2010-2014. Since then, and in the last two years especially, it has been slimmer pickings for volatility.

That has led to a widespread belief in investing land that we are due for a return. Here again, the answer is, perhaps, and then, so what? It is always wise to position portfolios with the full expectation that volatility could erupt at any moment, triggered by political crises (North Korea anyone?) or rogue trading programs (remember the flash crash?) or sudden rotations out of one group (commodities in 2015, for instance). But volatility in today’s machine-enhanced trading environment can be both magnified in intensity and shortened in duration, as various puts, calls, and more complicated derivatives get triggered. Unless investors are in the business of trading volatility (and good luck with that), trying to trade, reposition, and protect themselves during bouts of volatility is probably a bad idea, both emotionally and financially. The goal is to be positioned for some volatility, not to position during it.

But then there is the larger so what? When stocks and sectors plummet sharply, pessimists have a field day, declaring that this is the beginning of the long-anticipated end. Well, maybe. Often, however, it is just a bout, without deep structural or fundamental roots, that passes like a hurricane and just as quickly. Unless the volatility is a sign of structural defects, it will burn out.

There is no shortage of candidates for defects in today’s markets, ranging from excessive global debt to a conviction that the financial system remains frailer than it might look. Even here, it is hard to find evidence of deep structural flaws, either globally or locally, other than a few countries here and there that could possibly implode the way Asian economies did in 1997. Even that event passed more quickly than most remember, though it did count as a real structural implosion.

Et tu P/E?

Every major US index is trading above its long-term average. There is some debate about what the actual forward price-earnings ratio (P/E) for the S&P 500 is, depending on who is doing the forward estimating of earnings, but it is certainly in the neighborhood of 20x. Global indices are less “stretched,” given that they only began to rally more recently (after 2014), but are still historically high.

That is often taken as a warning sign, but valuation concerns have been part of the mix for the past three years at least, and will remain there so long as valuations stay above a historical average that some take as a market absolute. It is not. Equities trade as part of a lattice of available investments, which includes liquid markets (such as bonds), and illiquid ones for those who have the means. Worldwide, almost all asset classes are outside of historical price ranges. On the negative side, that might mean that everything is ready for a major correction, which means no asset class anywhere will be safe. On the positive side, it means that the current levels of valuation are relatively supportable, even if they are historically deviating from some imagined mean.

Underlying all of this are the increasingly strong fundamentals of the bulk of national and international companies, with increasing earnings driven by revenue growth, aided by the recent US corporate tax cut, and bolstered by the synchronous expansion at the end of 2017 and into 2018 of all of the world’s major economies. This benign economic environment must be factored in.

And so…

The next time investors hear the plaint about the bull market’s length, the lack of volatility, and pricey valuations, they should stop and ask if we are truly so out of sync, either with the past or with the world as we currently can gauge it. It is always, always possible that we are on the brink of something bad. But it is also possible that we are in the midst of a long equity bull market, like the one that lasted from 1982-2000, and at the end of a bond bull market that endured more than three decades. Any volatility or valuations concerns in the midst of that larger trend will likely be shorter-lived than the trend itself. That may prove incorrect, but it is a perspective that should help guide decisions if investors are to take advantage of the period we find ourselves in.

January Takeaway:

Investors appear concerned that the nine-year bull market may be aging, citing an inevitable return to volatility coupled with high valuations as rationalization for their fears. Volatility is indeed low, and of course could surge again. But absent structural defects, volatility tends to subside. Although valuations appear high only when viewed in isolation, prices must be considered in relationship to all available investments, which are outside historical ranges worldwide. Past bull markets had some down years, but they quickly recovered to surge even higher. And even bear markets had years that posted gains in excess of 20%. Most global and domestic companies have strong fundamentals, and those in the US are underpinned by strong revenue growth and the corporate tax cut. The bull market could be ending—anything is possible. But that perspective works both ways, and the bull market could continue to charge forward just as readily. With historical evidence suggesting it could, advisors should be prepared to position clients’ portfolios to take advantage of it.

The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this commentary is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Indices are unmanaged and their returns assume reinvestment of dividends and do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Information obtained from third-party sources is believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet | PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.

Neither Envestnet, Envestnet | PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. 


Articles By This Author

The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2018 Video: Five (Investing) Rules To Live By The Envestnet Edge, March/April 2018 Video: Buy The Dips Video: No Place Like Home? Market Bias Perceptions and Realities The Envestnet Edge, February 2018 The Envestnet Edge, January 2018 Video: Raging or Aging: How Much Longer Will the Bull Last? Webinar Replay: 2018 Market Outlook The Envestnet Edge, December 2017 Video: Bitcoin, Bubbles, and the Bigger Picture The Envestnet Edge, November 2017 Video: Taxes are certain, but don't obsess about tax reform The Envestnet Edge, October 2017 Video: Time to stock up on growth or value? The Envestnet Edge, September 2017 Video: Time To Take A (Measured) Risk? The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2017 Video: Bitcoin: Buy Or Buyer Beware? The Envestnet Edge, June 2017 Video: FANG, FAAMG: Too Big a Bite of the Market? The Envestnet Edge, May 2017 Video: Invest "As If" The Envestnet Edge, April 2017 Video: What To Do In Quiet Markets The Envestnet Edge, March 2017 Video: Bull Or Bear: Should Investors Still Care? PMC Weekly Review - March 10, 2017 The Envestnet Edge, February 2017 Video: Separating markets from politics, is it really a "Trump rally"? The Envestnet Edge, January 2017 Video: Investing in Trump’s Economy? Proceed With Caution The Envestnet Edge, December 2016 Video: Have We Only Just Begun? The Envestnet Edge, November 2016 Video: Rotations, Reversals, Rising Rates: A Time to Reposition Post-Election, Will Markets and Portfolios Emerge Winners or Losers? Webinar Replay: Post-Election Winners and Losers The Envestnet Edge, October 2016 Video: In a 2-2-2 world, look for modest economic growth and expansion PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, September 2016 Video: Diversification is working in 2016 (so far) The Envestnet Edge, July/August 2016 Video: Valuations: it's all relative Brexit: Plunging into the Unknown? The Envestnet Edge, June 2016 Video: Equity valuations and bond yields: reach no further PMC Weekly Review - June 17, 2016 The Envestnet Edge, May 2016 Video: Hitting singles: a measured approach for this investing season The Envestnet Edge, April 2016 Video: Investing with impact: increasingly a matter-of-fact Video: In this election cycle, will investors be winners or losers? The Envestnet Edge, March 2016 PMC Weekly Review - March 11, 2016 Video: In a low-growth world, less could be more The Envestnet Edge, February 2016 The Envestnet Edge, January 2016 Video: Markets are a mess, but don't jump to conclusions yet A Most Challenging Year Video: Interest Rates and Energy: The Highs and Lows of Year-End The Envestnet Edge, December 2015 The Envestnet Edge, November 2015 Video: We'll always have Paris The Envestnet Edge, October 2015 Video: Politics and the markets: déjà vu all over again? Video: China, Commodities, and Crisis: What's Next for Emerging Markets? The Envestnet Edge, September 2015 PMC Weekly Review - September 11, 2015 Is This The Big One (Financially Speaking)? Probably Not. The Envestnet Edge, August 2015 Video: In a "meh" market, look again at U.S. stocks The Envestnet Edge, July 2015 Video: Is this the Big One? What to do in a financial crisis Don't Worry About China Don’t Believe the Hype About Greece The Greek Catastrophe Is Finally Here (Unless It Isn’t) The Envestnet Edge, May/June 2015 Video: When Following the Herd is Risky, Where is the Safety? The Envestnet Edge, April 2015 Video: The End of Short-Termism is Long Overdue PMC Weekly Review - April 24, 2015 Video: Keep Your Friends Close and Your Robo-Advisor Closer The Envestnet Edge, March 2015 The Envestnet Edge, February 2015 Video: The Return of the Comeback: Is 2015 the Year for International Stocks? PMC Weekly Review - February 13, 2015 Why the Jobs Report Means Diddly Don’t Turn America Into Europe PMC Weekly Review - January 23, 2015 Video: Active and Passive: The Yin and Yang of Investing The Envestnet Edge, January 2015 Will Politics in 2015 Catch Up with the Economy? Video: Our Perspective on 2015: Maintain Yours The Envestnet Edge, December 2014 PMC Market Commentary: December 12, 2014 No, This Is NOT the '90s Economy Again PMC Market Commentary: November 14, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, November 2014 Video: 2014 U.S. Midterms: A Win for Stocks? Whose Economy Will It Be in 2016? PMC Market Commentary: October 17, 2014 Video: Special Video Commentary: Market Volatility and Fundamentals The Envestnet Edge, October 2014 Video: You Know What’s Not Sustainable? Ignoring the Opportunity in Impact Investing Don’t Panic! PMC Market Commentary: October 10, 2014 Greenberg’s Folly Naomi Klein Is Wrong PMC Market Commentary: September 26, 2014 Subprime Loans Are Back! Video: When it Comes to Interest Rates, Who Says What Comes Down Must Go Up? The Envestnet Edge, September 2014 PMC Market Commentary: September 12, 2014 Why Indie Bookstores Are on the Rise Again The Fed Is Not As Powerful As We Think PMC Market Commentary: August 22, 2014 Americans' Sour Mood on the Economy Doesn't Square with the Fact The Envestnet Edge, August 2014 Video: The World is in Crisis... the Markets are not PMC Market Commentary: August 8, 2014 PMC Market Commentary: July 25, 2014 Punitive Damages Video: Market Valuations and The Theory of Relativity The Envestnet Edge, July 2014 Don’t Kill the Export-Import Bank. Clone It. How India’s Economic Rise Could Bolster America’s Economy Video: Separating Risk from Reality PMC Market Commentary: June 27, 2014 No Sex Please, We're French PMC Market Commentary: June 13, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, June 2014 PMC Weekly Market Review, May 23, 2014 The Envestnet Edge, May 2014 Don't Bet on Rising Wages PMC Market Commentary: May 9, 2014 The Sharing Economy: Why Are So Many So Afraid? PMC Market Commentary: April 25, 2014 The Obsession with CEO Pay Won't Help the Middle Class PMC Market Commentary: April 11, 2014 Time to Face Reality: Our Unemployment Problems Are Structural PMC Market Commentary: March 28, 2014 In Defense of Relentless Optimism The "Made in China" Fallacy Forget GDP - Use Big Data