PMC Weekly Review - September 16, 2019
On the morning of September 14, 1814, Francis Scott Key penned the first verse of The Star Spangled Banner on the back of a letter as he watched with pride as a group of US soldiers raised the American flag over Fort McHenry a day after more than 24 hours of continuous bombardment by the British. For the history buffs among us, the battle was a critical victory in the War of 1812 that began, somewhat ironically, given the current state of affairs with China, over a trade war with Britain. The instantly recognizable lyrics, which would not officially become our country’s national anthem until 1931, still resonate deeply with Americans and are a fitting backdrop for our discussion this week. Although Britain is no longer the primary subject of our trade grievances, the status of intercountry relations and the shape of the global trade landscape remain paramount to the health of our stock market and economy overall.
The state of US-China trade affairs is certainly one of many public concerns that will weigh on Federal Reserve (the Fed) officials as they assemble in Washington next week for September’s FOMC meeting. The consensus seems to be that the Committee will cut rates by 25 basis points, although some would advocate for zero or even negative interest rates. The press had a field day on Wednesday when President Trump called for Fed ‘boneheads’ to slash interest rates to zero or less in an attempt to mimic what many of our trading partners are doing, refinance our debt, and “pay the lowest rate.” Notably, several large central banks began cutting rates earlier in the year, a trend that analysts expect will continue given existing trade dynamics and weakness in global growth.
The dollar has indeed rallied for the better part of the last 18 months on the heels of strong demand for US government debt—a light in a sea of low- or negative-yielding assets. The Chinese yuan recently hit an 11-year low against the greenback (7.1 CNY: 1 USD), and many analysts believe it could weaken further going into year end, as China strategically allows its currency to remain low to retain trading power over its competitors and make its goods less expensive in international markets. Structural issues in countries like Columbia and Argentina have been particularly pronounced, as currency collapses in recent weeks have propelled them to all-time lows against the dollar. Inevitably, we saw some dollar weakening this week ahead of the FOMC meeting, and would expect demand for the dollar to continue to ebb given the existing lower rate trajectory.
On Thursday, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it would cut its key interest rate by 10 basis points to -0.50% and recommence its monthly bond repurchase program to the tune of €20 million per month of eurozone debt beginning November 1— setting the stage for an extended period of quantitative easing in the region. ECB President Mario Draghi cited weak growth and muted inflation as key factors in driving its decision. In response, President Trump renewed his pressure on the Fed, expressing frustration with the pace of domestic interest rate cuts. The reality, of course, is that the US economy, while slowing, is otherwise fairly sound, and the Fed’s measured approach offers flexibility to take more aggressive action down the road should a sharp downturn occur. Certainly, Draghi’s successor, Christine Laggard, could face a constrained toolkit with which to address any further deterioration in the region when she takes office on November 1.
Among the leading indicators this week, initial jobless claims fell by 13,000 to 204,000, August’s core Producer Price Index (PPI) came in higher than expected (0.30% vs 0.20%), showing some pressure on producer margins, and August’s core Consumer Price Index (CPI) also rose more than expected (0.30% vs 0.20%), with signs of inflation trickling through to the consumer. US stocks were up on hopes of easing US-China trade tensions, following news that Trump would delay Chinese tariffs from October 1 to October 15 as a gesture of good will in response to Chinese Vice Premier Liu He’s request for a reprieve related to observing the 70th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China. In return, China waived import tariffs on 16 US goods, including shrimp and fish meal. Also in the headlines were the Hong Kong Stock Exchange’s bid for the London Stock Exchange; several major corporate layoffs (including State Street, Schwab, and Uber); and National Security Advisor John Bolton’s resignation. Notably, Bolton and President Trump have publically disagreed on many issues of national security, with the most recent being what he viewed as President Trump’s ill-timed invitation to meet with the Taliban at Camp David to discuss an Afghan peace treaty ahead of the 18th anniversary of the September 11 attacks.
In closing, we would be remiss not to pay a somber tribute to the memory of our financial services colleagues lost that fateful day. As we imagine the awe that Francis Scott Key must have felt as he watched his comrades overcome adversity and raise the American flag during the Battle of Baltimore, We cannot help but draw parallels to the sense of patriotism and unity we felt as a nation as we watched with bated breath the fire fighters raise our flag on Ground Zero 18 years ago. Whether the US economy will face recessionary pressures is uncertain, but we continue to believe that there are few better places to be invested than the good ole’ USA.
…And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave. O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
Cynthia Crandall, CAIA| VP, Senior Investment Analyst
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice. Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index. Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses. Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. © 2019 Envestnet. All rights reserved.