PMC Weekly Review - November 25, 2019
In September, scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced that in 2018, Earth’s atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) averaged 407.4 parts per million (ppm). According to NOAA, this represented the highest concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere for at least the last 800,000 years—longer than anatomically modern humans have existed. The increasing prevalence and intensity of droughts, fires, and other severe weather events resulting from the rising concentration of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have led to increasing pressure on governments and other organizations to address the crisis. For roughly the past decade, a humble solution for financing a carbon-free future has been sprouting in the global debt markets—the green bond.
Although limited bond issuance to finance clean energy projects in the US did come to the municipal bond market in the early 2000s, the World Bank lays claim to the title of first green bond issuer. Hot off the heels of the 2007 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, which cited humans’ fossil fuel consumption as the driver of climate change, Swedish pension funds engaged with the World Bank and the Center for International Climate and Research (CICERO) to explore investing in climate change solutions. In 2008, the World Bank issued the first-ever green bond to fund projects aimed squarely at climate change mitigation and adaptation.
One green shoot quickly burst into many. Governments, supra and subnational agencies, development banks, and private organizations have issued more than $580 billion in green bonds through 2018, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance, though estimates vary, given the heterogeneity of the market and differing qualifying criteria. As of September 2019, the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI), a nonprofit entity working to promote climate solutions via the bond market, has reported another $216.4 billion in issuance, eclipsing 2018, with a full quarter to go. The CBI estimates that more than half of the green bond market’s proceeds have financed renewable energy projects such as solar and wind. Clean transportation, building efficiency, and sustainable agriculture and forestry initiatives have benefited from green bond financing as well.
Although the utility of these projects and the need to fund them are clear, green bonds are not without controversy. The continued lack of a universally accepted standard in green bond definitions has led to ambiguity and disputes about the reputability of some green bonds, like those of China’s Three Gorges Corporation, which is not exactly known for its environmental friendliness. “Greenwashing” has come to describe some entities’ pursuit of the positive PR associated with a reputation for sustainability, if not necessarily its reality. The environmental intensity of both Spanish oil company, Repsol, and Russian aluminum producer, Rusal, for example, aroused some controversy. Mindful of this, organizations such as the International Capital Markets Association (ICMA) and the European Commission (EC) have striven to define more clearly what it means to be green, while a substantial verification industry has arisen to facilitate reporting and accountability. Nonetheless, strong and rising demand for anything with a verdant hue has outstripped supply, particularly in the euro-denominated bond market, where recent oversubscription to green bonds is higher than their “vanilla” counterparts, despite the higher reporting costs associated with going green.
With strong interest in these instruments and a massive funding gap to meet the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, both the demand and the necessary projects do not seem to be going away. Despite the headwinds of reporting, compliance, and some less-than-scrupulous market participants, the green bond market has proven to be a crucial funding mechanism for governments, the private sector, and nonprofit organizations working to address the climate crisis. With green bonds comprising only a minute fraction of the roughly $102.8 trillion global bond market, the market’s saplings still have plenty of room to grow into sequoias.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice. Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index. Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses. Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor. © 2019 Envestnet. All rights reserved.