PMC Weekly Review - October 14, 2016
A Macro View: Money Market Reform – Impact and Expectations
Money markets have long been viewed as a safe and boring afterthought in the context of a diversified portfolio, but things may become a little more interesting on Friday. October 14th marks the deadline for compliance with the SEC’s long-awaited reforms in the regulation of money market portfolios. These reforms are aimed at fostering financial market stability and preventing a “break the buck” scenario in the event of a financial crisis like 2008. Much stricter requirements will be enforced for all non-government money market portfolios, most notably prime and municipal money markets. These measures include a floating net asset value (NAV) and the fund manager’s ability to impose liquidity fees or the outright suspensions of redemptions.
The reforms already have resulted in a $1 trillion exodus from prime funds, and many asset management firms have converted their prime money market portfolios into government-only funds in an effort to meet client demand and avoid the floating NAV. These measures also have had visible impacts on financial markets. Three-month London Interbank Borrowing Rate (LIBOR) has been trending upward for months, reaching a post-crisis high of 87 basis points, as banks have been forced to increase their short-term offer rates to attract lenders. This, of course, has consequences for floating-rate securities, such as bank loans, which use LIBOR as a reference rate. US municipalities also face a jump in short-term borrowing costs due to a similar rise in the Securities Industry and Financial Market Association (SIFMA) rate, the baseline for short-term municipal debt instruments, such as variable-rate demand notes.
Potential longer-term impacts of these reforms remain to be seen. The increase in government-only mandates will continue to drive up demand for T-Bills and other short-dated government issued securities. Of course, the supply of these securities is dependent on fiscal policy and the budget deficit, and could eventually be affected by Congress’ willingness (or lack thereof), to raise the debt ceiling. These reforms also may limit the Fed’s ability to control short-term interest rates, as stronger demand for government securities places a cap on short-term Treasury yields and exerts pressure on the Fed’s reverse repo facility. At the same time, demand for short-dated corporate paper has declined, which likely will continue to have an impact on companies’ borrowing costs to meet their short-term financing needs. Jerome Schneider, head of short-term portfolio management at PIMCO, emphasized the spike in LIBOR is “not just the market’s reaction to a piece of data, but a structural reform that changes the way investors allocate their cash”, meaning higher LIBOR rates are likely here to stay.
The one variable that could reverse the current trend toward government money markets is higher interest rates—if the yield on prime money markets reaches a point where it begins to draw investors away from government-only portfolios. Although the SEC’s good intentions aim to protect investors and reduce the potential for contagion in the event of a financial market crisis, it is unclear whether these money market reforms will ultimately be beneficial, or become an impediment to efficient capital markets.
The information, analysis, and opinions expressed herein are for general and educational purposes only. Nothing contained in this weekly review is intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, nor a solicitation of any type. All investments carry a certain risk, and there is no assurance that an investment will provide positive performance over any period of time. An investor may experience loss of principal. Investment decisions should always be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. The asset classes and/or investment strategies described may not be suitable for all investors and investors should consult with an investment advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategy. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Information obtained from third party sources are believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. Envestnet|PMC™ makes no representation regarding the accuracy or completeness of information provided herein. All opinions and views constitute our judgments as of the date of writing and are subject to change at any time without notice.
Investments in smaller companies carry greater risk than is customarily associated with larger companies for various reasons such as volatility of earnings and prospects, higher failure rates, and limited markets, product lines or financial resources. Investing overseas involves special risks, including the volatility of currency exchange rates and, in some cases, limited geographic focus, political and economic instability, and relatively illiquid markets. Income (bond) securities are subject to interest rate risk, which is the risk that debt securities in a portfolio will decline in value because of increases in market interest rates. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are subject to risks similar to those of stocks, such as market risk. Investing in ETFs may bear indirect fees and expenses charged by ETFs in addition to its direct fees and expenses, as well as indirectly bearing the principal risks of those ETFs. ETFs may trade at a discount to their net asset value and are subject to the market fluctuations of their underlying investments. Investing in commodities can be volatile and can suffer from periods of prolonged decline in value and may not be suitable for all investors. Index Performance is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not represent the performance of any specific investment product or portfolio. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Alternative Investments may have complex terms and features that are not easily understood and are not suitable for all investors. You should conduct your own due diligence to ensure you understand the features of the product before investing. Alternative investment strategies may employ a variety of hedging techniques and non-traditional instruments such as inverse and leveraged products. Certain hedging techniques include matched combinations that neutralize or offset individual risks such as merger arbitrage, long/short equity, convertible bond arbitrage and fixed-income arbitrage. Leveraged products are those that employ financial derivatives and debt to try to achieve a multiple (for example two or three times) of the return or inverse return of a stated index or benchmark over the course of a single day. Inverse products utilize short selling, derivatives trading, and other leveraged investment techniques, such as futures trading to achieve their objectives, mainly to track the inverse of their benchmarks. As with all investments, there is no assurance that any investment strategies will achieve their objectives or protect against losses.
Neither Envestnet, Envestnet|PMC™ nor its representatives render tax, accounting or legal advice. Any tax statements contained herein are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding U.S. federal, state, or local tax penalties. Taxpayers should always seek advice based on their own particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.
© 2016 Envestnet. All rights reserved.